Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development

African farming systems are highly heterogeneous: between agroecological and socioeconomic environments, in the wide variability in farmers' resource endowments and in farm management. This means that single solutions (or 'silver bullets') for improving farm productivity do not exist. Yet to date few approaches to understand constraints and explore options for change have tackled the bewildering complexity of African farming systems. In this paper we describe the Nutrient Use in Animal and Cropping systems - Efficiencies and Scales (NUANCES) framework. NUANCES offers a structured approach to unravel and understand the complexity of African farming to identify what we term 'best-fit' technologies - technologies targeted to specific types of farmers and to specific niches within their farms. The NUANCES framework is not 'just another computer model'! We combine the tools of systems analysis and experimentation, detailed field observations and surveys, incorporate expert knowledge (local knowledge and results of research), generate databases, and apply simulation models to analyse performance of farms, and the impacts of introducing new technologies. We have analysed and described complexity of farming systems, their external drivers and some of the mechanisms that result in (in)efficient use of scarce resources. Studying sites across sub-Saharan Africa has provided insights in the trajectories of change in farming systems in response to population growth, economic conditions and climate variability (cycles of drier and wetter years) and climate change. In regions where human population is dense and land scarce, farm typologies have proven useful to target technologies between farmers of different production objectives and resource endowment (notably in terms of land, labour and capacity for investment). In such regions we could categorise types of fields on the basis of their responsiveness to soil improving technologies along soil fertility gradients, relying on local indicators to differentiate those that may be managed through 'maintenance fertilization' from fields that are highly-responsive to fertilizers and fields that require rehabilitation before yields can improved. Where human population pressure on the land is less intense, farm and field types are harder to discern, without clear patterns. Nutrient cycling through livestock is in principle not efficient for increasing food production due to increased nutrient losses, but is attractive for farmers due to the multiple functions of livestock. We identified trade-offs between income generation, soil conservation and community agreements through optimising concurrent objectives at farm and village levels. These examples show that future analyses must focus at farm and farming system level and not at the level of individual fields to achieve appropriate targeting of technologies - both between locations and between farms at any given location. The approach for integrated assessment described here can be used ex ante to explore the potential of best-fit technologies and the ways they can be best combined at farm level. The dynamic and integrated nature of the framework allows the impact of changes in external drivers such as climate change or development policy to be analysed. Fundamental questions for integrated analysis relate to the site-specific knowledge and the simplification of processes required to integrate and move from one level to the next.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giller, Ken E., Tittonell, Pablo, Rufino, Mariana Cristina, Van Wijk, Mark T., Zingore, S., Mapfumo, P., Adjei-Nsiah, Samuel, Herrero, M., Chikowo, Régis, Corbeels, Marc, Rowe, E.C., Baijukya, F.P., Mwijage, A., Smith, Julian, Yeboah, E., Van der Burg, W.J., Sanogo, O.M., Misiko, Michael, De Ridder, Nico, Karanja, S., Kaizzi, C.K., K'ungu, J., Mwale, M., Nwaga, D., Pacini, Cesare, Vanlauwe, Bernard
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:P35 - Fertilité du sol, F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture, U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques, fertilité du sol, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_165,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/558788/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/558788/1/document_558788.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-558788
record_format koha
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic P35 - Fertilité du sol
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
fertilité du sol
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_165
P35 - Fertilité du sol
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
fertilité du sol
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_165
spellingShingle P35 - Fertilité du sol
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
fertilité du sol
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_165
P35 - Fertilité du sol
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
fertilité du sol
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_165
Giller, Ken E.
Tittonell, Pablo
Rufino, Mariana Cristina
Van Wijk, Mark T.
Zingore, S.
Mapfumo, P.
Adjei-Nsiah, Samuel
Herrero, M.
Chikowo, Régis
Corbeels, Marc
Rowe, E.C.
Baijukya, F.P.
Mwijage, A.
Smith, Julian
Yeboah, E.
Van der Burg, W.J.
Sanogo, O.M.
Misiko, Michael
De Ridder, Nico
Karanja, S.
Kaizzi, C.K.
K'ungu, J.
Mwale, M.
Nwaga, D.
Pacini, Cesare
Vanlauwe, Bernard
Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development
description African farming systems are highly heterogeneous: between agroecological and socioeconomic environments, in the wide variability in farmers' resource endowments and in farm management. This means that single solutions (or 'silver bullets') for improving farm productivity do not exist. Yet to date few approaches to understand constraints and explore options for change have tackled the bewildering complexity of African farming systems. In this paper we describe the Nutrient Use in Animal and Cropping systems - Efficiencies and Scales (NUANCES) framework. NUANCES offers a structured approach to unravel and understand the complexity of African farming to identify what we term 'best-fit' technologies - technologies targeted to specific types of farmers and to specific niches within their farms. The NUANCES framework is not 'just another computer model'! We combine the tools of systems analysis and experimentation, detailed field observations and surveys, incorporate expert knowledge (local knowledge and results of research), generate databases, and apply simulation models to analyse performance of farms, and the impacts of introducing new technologies. We have analysed and described complexity of farming systems, their external drivers and some of the mechanisms that result in (in)efficient use of scarce resources. Studying sites across sub-Saharan Africa has provided insights in the trajectories of change in farming systems in response to population growth, economic conditions and climate variability (cycles of drier and wetter years) and climate change. In regions where human population is dense and land scarce, farm typologies have proven useful to target technologies between farmers of different production objectives and resource endowment (notably in terms of land, labour and capacity for investment). In such regions we could categorise types of fields on the basis of their responsiveness to soil improving technologies along soil fertility gradients, relying on local indicators to differentiate those that may be managed through 'maintenance fertilization' from fields that are highly-responsive to fertilizers and fields that require rehabilitation before yields can improved. Where human population pressure on the land is less intense, farm and field types are harder to discern, without clear patterns. Nutrient cycling through livestock is in principle not efficient for increasing food production due to increased nutrient losses, but is attractive for farmers due to the multiple functions of livestock. We identified trade-offs between income generation, soil conservation and community agreements through optimising concurrent objectives at farm and village levels. These examples show that future analyses must focus at farm and farming system level and not at the level of individual fields to achieve appropriate targeting of technologies - both between locations and between farms at any given location. The approach for integrated assessment described here can be used ex ante to explore the potential of best-fit technologies and the ways they can be best combined at farm level. The dynamic and integrated nature of the framework allows the impact of changes in external drivers such as climate change or development policy to be analysed. Fundamental questions for integrated analysis relate to the site-specific knowledge and the simplification of processes required to integrate and move from one level to the next.
format article
topic_facet P35 - Fertilité du sol
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
fertilité du sol
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_165
author Giller, Ken E.
Tittonell, Pablo
Rufino, Mariana Cristina
Van Wijk, Mark T.
Zingore, S.
Mapfumo, P.
Adjei-Nsiah, Samuel
Herrero, M.
Chikowo, Régis
Corbeels, Marc
Rowe, E.C.
Baijukya, F.P.
Mwijage, A.
Smith, Julian
Yeboah, E.
Van der Burg, W.J.
Sanogo, O.M.
Misiko, Michael
De Ridder, Nico
Karanja, S.
Kaizzi, C.K.
K'ungu, J.
Mwale, M.
Nwaga, D.
Pacini, Cesare
Vanlauwe, Bernard
author_facet Giller, Ken E.
Tittonell, Pablo
Rufino, Mariana Cristina
Van Wijk, Mark T.
Zingore, S.
Mapfumo, P.
Adjei-Nsiah, Samuel
Herrero, M.
Chikowo, Régis
Corbeels, Marc
Rowe, E.C.
Baijukya, F.P.
Mwijage, A.
Smith, Julian
Yeboah, E.
Van der Burg, W.J.
Sanogo, O.M.
Misiko, Michael
De Ridder, Nico
Karanja, S.
Kaizzi, C.K.
K'ungu, J.
Mwale, M.
Nwaga, D.
Pacini, Cesare
Vanlauwe, Bernard
author_sort Giller, Ken E.
title Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development
title_short Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development
title_full Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development
title_fullStr Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development
title_full_unstemmed Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development
title_sort communicating complexity: integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within african farming systems to support innovation and development
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/558788/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/558788/1/document_558788.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gillerkene communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT tittonellpablo communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT rufinomarianacristina communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT vanwijkmarkt communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT zingores communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT mapfumop communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT adjeinsiahsamuel communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT herrerom communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT chikoworegis communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT corbeelsmarc communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT roweec communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT baijukyafp communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT mwijagea communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT smithjulian communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT yeboahe communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT vanderburgwj communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT sanogoom communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT misikomichael communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT deriddernico communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT karanjas communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT kaizzick communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT kunguj communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT mwalem communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT nwagad communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT pacinicesare communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
AT vanlauwebernard communicatingcomplexityintegratedassessmentoftradeoffsconcerningsoilfertilitymanagementwithinafricanfarmingsystemstosupportinnovationanddevelopment
_version_ 1792497757358915584
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5587882024-01-28T18:59:51Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/558788/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/558788/ Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development. Giller Ken E., Tittonell Pablo, Rufino Mariana Cristina, Van Wijk Mark T., Zingore S., Mapfumo P., Adjei-Nsiah Samuel, Herrero M., Chikowo Régis, Corbeels Marc, Rowe E.C., Baijukya F.P., Mwijage A., Smith Julian, Yeboah E., Van der Burg W.J., Sanogo O.M., Misiko Michael, De Ridder Nico, Karanja S., Kaizzi C.K., K'ungu J., Mwale M., Nwaga D., Pacini Cesare, Vanlauwe Bernard. 2011. Agricultural Systems, 104 (2) : 191-203.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.002 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.002> Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development Giller, Ken E. Tittonell, Pablo Rufino, Mariana Cristina Van Wijk, Mark T. Zingore, S. Mapfumo, P. Adjei-Nsiah, Samuel Herrero, M. Chikowo, Régis Corbeels, Marc Rowe, E.C. Baijukya, F.P. Mwijage, A. Smith, Julian Yeboah, E. Van der Burg, W.J. Sanogo, O.M. Misiko, Michael De Ridder, Nico Karanja, S. Kaizzi, C.K. K'ungu, J. Mwale, M. Nwaga, D. Pacini, Cesare Vanlauwe, Bernard eng 2011 Agricultural Systems P35 - Fertilité du sol F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques fertilité du sol http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170 Afrique http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_165 African farming systems are highly heterogeneous: between agroecological and socioeconomic environments, in the wide variability in farmers' resource endowments and in farm management. This means that single solutions (or 'silver bullets') for improving farm productivity do not exist. Yet to date few approaches to understand constraints and explore options for change have tackled the bewildering complexity of African farming systems. In this paper we describe the Nutrient Use in Animal and Cropping systems - Efficiencies and Scales (NUANCES) framework. NUANCES offers a structured approach to unravel and understand the complexity of African farming to identify what we term 'best-fit' technologies - technologies targeted to specific types of farmers and to specific niches within their farms. The NUANCES framework is not 'just another computer model'! We combine the tools of systems analysis and experimentation, detailed field observations and surveys, incorporate expert knowledge (local knowledge and results of research), generate databases, and apply simulation models to analyse performance of farms, and the impacts of introducing new technologies. We have analysed and described complexity of farming systems, their external drivers and some of the mechanisms that result in (in)efficient use of scarce resources. Studying sites across sub-Saharan Africa has provided insights in the trajectories of change in farming systems in response to population growth, economic conditions and climate variability (cycles of drier and wetter years) and climate change. In regions where human population is dense and land scarce, farm typologies have proven useful to target technologies between farmers of different production objectives and resource endowment (notably in terms of land, labour and capacity for investment). In such regions we could categorise types of fields on the basis of their responsiveness to soil improving technologies along soil fertility gradients, relying on local indicators to differentiate those that may be managed through 'maintenance fertilization' from fields that are highly-responsive to fertilizers and fields that require rehabilitation before yields can improved. Where human population pressure on the land is less intense, farm and field types are harder to discern, without clear patterns. Nutrient cycling through livestock is in principle not efficient for increasing food production due to increased nutrient losses, but is attractive for farmers due to the multiple functions of livestock. We identified trade-offs between income generation, soil conservation and community agreements through optimising concurrent objectives at farm and village levels. These examples show that future analyses must focus at farm and farming system level and not at the level of individual fields to achieve appropriate targeting of technologies - both between locations and between farms at any given location. The approach for integrated assessment described here can be used ex ante to explore the potential of best-fit technologies and the ways they can be best combined at farm level. The dynamic and integrated nature of the framework allows the impact of changes in external drivers such as climate change or development policy to be analysed. Fundamental questions for integrated analysis relate to the site-specific knowledge and the simplification of processes required to integrate and move from one level to the next. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/558788/1/document_558788.pdf application/pdf Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.002 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.002 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.002 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.002