Reduced agent-area treatments (RAAT) for management of rangeland grasshoppers : efficacy and economics under operational conditions

The Reduced Agent-Area Treatment (RAAT) approach involves applying low rates of insecticides in intermittent swaths to control grasshopper infestations in an effort to achieve a more economically and environmentally sound pest management strategy compared to traditional blanket applications at high rates. Operational-scale (>250 ha) insecticide tests on Wyoming rangeland grasshopper infestations (18-56 grasshoppers/m2 ) at two sites in 1997 revealed that carbaryl yielded 94% control as a blanket treatment (560 g/ha) and 81% control as a RAAT application (280 g/ha applied to 50% of the infested land). Malathion yielded 90% control as a blanket treatment (683 g/1 ha) and 91 % control as an RAAT application (342 g/ha applied to 80% of the infested land), and fipronil (4 g/ha) yielded 98% control as a blanket treatment and 92% control when applied to 33% of the infested land. One year after treatment, the RAAT and blanket-treated plots had 2-4% (Pollet Ranch) of the densities in untreated plots. Economic analysis showed that the greatest benefit:cost ratio was obtained with the fipronil_RAAT method, followed by carbaryl-RAAT, malathion-RAAT, ma-lathion-blanket, fipronil-blanket, carbaryl-blanket. The worst-case out-come of fipronil and carbaryl with a RAAT approach had a greater economic return than the best-case outcome of no treatment. Following blanket treatments, non-target arthropod abundance was highest in the fipronil plots, followed by carbaryl and malathion; arthropod biomass was higher in the carbaryl plots than fipronil and malathion. In RAAT plots, arthropods were generally less impacted than in the blanket plots, with the least reduction caused by fipronil and carbaryl. Thus, the RAAT tactic appears to be economically and environmentally superior to blanket treatments under large-scale, operational conditions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lockwood, Jeffrey A., Schell, Scott P., Foster, R. Nelson, Reuter, Chris, Rachadi, Tahar
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:H10 - Ravageurs des plantes, Acrididae, agriculture alternative, analyse économique, pesticide, lutte anti-insecte, expérimentation au champ, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4416, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5739, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33990, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8452, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8114,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/475660/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/475660/1/475660.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-475660
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-4756602024-01-28T08:22:21Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/475660/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/475660/ Reduced agent-area treatments (RAAT) for management of rangeland grasshoppers : efficacy and economics under operational conditions. Lockwood Jeffrey A., Schell Scott P., Foster R. Nelson, Reuter Chris, Rachadi Tahar. 2000. International Journal of Pest Management, 46 (1) : 29-42.https://doi.org/10.1080/096708700227552 <https://doi.org/10.1080/096708700227552> Reduced agent-area treatments (RAAT) for management of rangeland grasshoppers : efficacy and economics under operational conditions Lockwood, Jeffrey A. Schell, Scott P. Foster, R. Nelson Reuter, Chris Rachadi, Tahar eng 2000 International Journal of Pest Management H10 - Ravageurs des plantes Acrididae agriculture alternative analyse économique pesticide lutte anti-insecte expérimentation au champ http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4416 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5739 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33990 Wyoming États-Unis d'Amérique http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8452 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8114 The Reduced Agent-Area Treatment (RAAT) approach involves applying low rates of insecticides in intermittent swaths to control grasshopper infestations in an effort to achieve a more economically and environmentally sound pest management strategy compared to traditional blanket applications at high rates. Operational-scale (&gt;250 ha) insecticide tests on Wyoming rangeland grasshopper infestations (18-56 grasshoppers/m2 ) at two sites in 1997 revealed that carbaryl yielded 94% control as a blanket treatment (560 g/ha) and 81% control as a RAAT application (280 g/ha applied to 50% of the infested land). Malathion yielded 90% control as a blanket treatment (683 g/1 ha) and 91 % control as an RAAT application (342 g/ha applied to 80% of the infested land), and fipronil (4 g/ha) yielded 98% control as a blanket treatment and 92% control when applied to 33% of the infested land. One year after treatment, the RAAT and blanket-treated plots had 2-4% (Pollet Ranch) of the densities in untreated plots. Economic analysis showed that the greatest benefit:cost ratio was obtained with the fipronil_RAAT method, followed by carbaryl-RAAT, malathion-RAAT, ma-lathion-blanket, fipronil-blanket, carbaryl-blanket. The worst-case out-come of fipronil and carbaryl with a RAAT approach had a greater economic return than the best-case outcome of no treatment. Following blanket treatments, non-target arthropod abundance was highest in the fipronil plots, followed by carbaryl and malathion; arthropod biomass was higher in the carbaryl plots than fipronil and malathion. In RAAT plots, arthropods were generally less impacted than in the blanket plots, with the least reduction caused by fipronil and carbaryl. Thus, the RAAT tactic appears to be economically and environmentally superior to blanket treatments under large-scale, operational conditions. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/475660/1/475660.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1080/096708700227552 10.1080/096708700227552 http://catalogue-bibliotheques.cirad.fr/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=161766 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/096708700227552 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1080/096708700227552
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic H10 - Ravageurs des plantes
Acrididae
agriculture alternative
analyse économique
pesticide
lutte anti-insecte
expérimentation au champ
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4416
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5739
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33990
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8452
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8114
H10 - Ravageurs des plantes
Acrididae
agriculture alternative
analyse économique
pesticide
lutte anti-insecte
expérimentation au champ
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4416
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5739
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33990
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8452
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8114
spellingShingle H10 - Ravageurs des plantes
Acrididae
agriculture alternative
analyse économique
pesticide
lutte anti-insecte
expérimentation au champ
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4416
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5739
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33990
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8452
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8114
H10 - Ravageurs des plantes
Acrididae
agriculture alternative
analyse économique
pesticide
lutte anti-insecte
expérimentation au champ
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4416
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5739
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33990
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8452
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8114
Lockwood, Jeffrey A.
Schell, Scott P.
Foster, R. Nelson
Reuter, Chris
Rachadi, Tahar
Reduced agent-area treatments (RAAT) for management of rangeland grasshoppers : efficacy and economics under operational conditions
description The Reduced Agent-Area Treatment (RAAT) approach involves applying low rates of insecticides in intermittent swaths to control grasshopper infestations in an effort to achieve a more economically and environmentally sound pest management strategy compared to traditional blanket applications at high rates. Operational-scale (&gt;250 ha) insecticide tests on Wyoming rangeland grasshopper infestations (18-56 grasshoppers/m2 ) at two sites in 1997 revealed that carbaryl yielded 94% control as a blanket treatment (560 g/ha) and 81% control as a RAAT application (280 g/ha applied to 50% of the infested land). Malathion yielded 90% control as a blanket treatment (683 g/1 ha) and 91 % control as an RAAT application (342 g/ha applied to 80% of the infested land), and fipronil (4 g/ha) yielded 98% control as a blanket treatment and 92% control when applied to 33% of the infested land. One year after treatment, the RAAT and blanket-treated plots had 2-4% (Pollet Ranch) of the densities in untreated plots. Economic analysis showed that the greatest benefit:cost ratio was obtained with the fipronil_RAAT method, followed by carbaryl-RAAT, malathion-RAAT, ma-lathion-blanket, fipronil-blanket, carbaryl-blanket. The worst-case out-come of fipronil and carbaryl with a RAAT approach had a greater economic return than the best-case outcome of no treatment. Following blanket treatments, non-target arthropod abundance was highest in the fipronil plots, followed by carbaryl and malathion; arthropod biomass was higher in the carbaryl plots than fipronil and malathion. In RAAT plots, arthropods were generally less impacted than in the blanket plots, with the least reduction caused by fipronil and carbaryl. Thus, the RAAT tactic appears to be economically and environmentally superior to blanket treatments under large-scale, operational conditions.
format article
topic_facet H10 - Ravageurs des plantes
Acrididae
agriculture alternative
analyse économique
pesticide
lutte anti-insecte
expérimentation au champ
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4416
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5739
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33990
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8452
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8114
author Lockwood, Jeffrey A.
Schell, Scott P.
Foster, R. Nelson
Reuter, Chris
Rachadi, Tahar
author_facet Lockwood, Jeffrey A.
Schell, Scott P.
Foster, R. Nelson
Reuter, Chris
Rachadi, Tahar
author_sort Lockwood, Jeffrey A.
title Reduced agent-area treatments (RAAT) for management of rangeland grasshoppers : efficacy and economics under operational conditions
title_short Reduced agent-area treatments (RAAT) for management of rangeland grasshoppers : efficacy and economics under operational conditions
title_full Reduced agent-area treatments (RAAT) for management of rangeland grasshoppers : efficacy and economics under operational conditions
title_fullStr Reduced agent-area treatments (RAAT) for management of rangeland grasshoppers : efficacy and economics under operational conditions
title_full_unstemmed Reduced agent-area treatments (RAAT) for management of rangeland grasshoppers : efficacy and economics under operational conditions
title_sort reduced agent-area treatments (raat) for management of rangeland grasshoppers : efficacy and economics under operational conditions
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/475660/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/475660/1/475660.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lockwoodjeffreya reducedagentareatreatmentsraatformanagementofrangelandgrasshoppersefficacyandeconomicsunderoperationalconditions
AT schellscottp reducedagentareatreatmentsraatformanagementofrangelandgrasshoppersefficacyandeconomicsunderoperationalconditions
AT fosterrnelson reducedagentareatreatmentsraatformanagementofrangelandgrasshoppersefficacyandeconomicsunderoperationalconditions
AT reuterchris reducedagentareatreatmentsraatformanagementofrangelandgrasshoppersefficacyandeconomicsunderoperationalconditions
AT rachaditahar reducedagentareatreatmentsraatformanagementofrangelandgrasshoppersefficacyandeconomicsunderoperationalconditions
_version_ 1792494685152870400