The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands

Simulation models quantify the impacts on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling in grasslandsystems caused by changes in management practices. To support agricultural policies, it is however important to contrast the responses of alternative models, which can differ greatly in their treatment of key processes and in their response to management. We applied eight biogeochemical models at five grassland sites (in France, New Zealand, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States) to compare the sensitivity of modelled C and N fluxes to changes in the density of grazing animals (from 100% to 50% of the original livestock densities), also in combination with decreasing N fertilization levels (reduced to zero from the initial levels). Simulated multi-model median values indicated that input reduction would lead to an increase in the C sink strength (negative net ecosystem C exchange) in intensive grazing systems: −64 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (animal density reduction) and −81 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1(N and animal density reduction), against the baseline of −30.5 ± 69.5 g C m−2 yr−1 (LSU [livestock units] ≥ 0.76 ha−1 yr−1). Simulations also indicated a strong effect of N fertilizer reduction on N fluxes, e.g. N2O-N emissions decreased from 0.34 ± 0.22 (baseline) to 0.1 ± 0.05 g N m−2 yr−1 (no N fertilization). Simulated decline in grazing intensity had only limited impact on the N balance. The simulated pattern of enteric methane emissions was dominated by high model-to-model variability. The reduction in simulated offtake (animal intake + cut biomass) led to a doubling in net primary production per animal (increased by 11.6 ± 8.1 t C LSU−1 yr−1 across sites). The highest N2O-N intensities (N2O-N/offtake) were simulated at mown and extensively grazed arid sites. We show the possibility of using grassland models to determine sound mitigation practices while quantifying the uncertainties associated with the simulated outputs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sándor, R., Ehrhardt, F., Brilli, L., Carozzi, M., Recous, S., Smith, P., Snow, V., Soussana, J.-F., Dorich, C.D., Fuchs, K., Fitton, N., Gongadze, K., Klumpp, K., Liebig, M., Martin, R., Merbold, Lutz, Newton, Paul C.D., Rees, R.M., Rolinski, Susanne, Bellocchi, G.
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-11
Subjects:animal feeding, livestock, nitrogen fixation, pollution, environmental engineering,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/96899
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.020
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-96899
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-968992023-12-08T19:36:04Z The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands Sándor, R. Ehrhardt, F. Brilli, L. Carozzi, M. Recous, S. Smith, P. Snow, V. Soussana, J.-F. Dorich, C.D. Fuchs, K. Fitton, N. Gongadze, K. Klumpp, K. Liebig, M. Martin, R. Merbold, Lutz Newton, Paul C.D. Rees, R.M. Rolinski, Susanne Bellocchi, G. animal feeding livestock nitrogen fixation pollution environmental engineering Simulation models quantify the impacts on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling in grasslandsystems caused by changes in management practices. To support agricultural policies, it is however important to contrast the responses of alternative models, which can differ greatly in their treatment of key processes and in their response to management. We applied eight biogeochemical models at five grassland sites (in France, New Zealand, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States) to compare the sensitivity of modelled C and N fluxes to changes in the density of grazing animals (from 100% to 50% of the original livestock densities), also in combination with decreasing N fertilization levels (reduced to zero from the initial levels). Simulated multi-model median values indicated that input reduction would lead to an increase in the C sink strength (negative net ecosystem C exchange) in intensive grazing systems: −64 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (animal density reduction) and −81 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1(N and animal density reduction), against the baseline of −30.5 ± 69.5 g C m−2 yr−1 (LSU [livestock units] ≥ 0.76 ha−1 yr−1). Simulations also indicated a strong effect of N fertilizer reduction on N fluxes, e.g. N2O-N emissions decreased from 0.34 ± 0.22 (baseline) to 0.1 ± 0.05 g N m−2 yr−1 (no N fertilization). Simulated decline in grazing intensity had only limited impact on the N balance. The simulated pattern of enteric methane emissions was dominated by high model-to-model variability. The reduction in simulated offtake (animal intake + cut biomass) led to a doubling in net primary production per animal (increased by 11.6 ± 8.1 t C LSU−1 yr−1 across sites). The highest N2O-N intensities (N2O-N/offtake) were simulated at mown and extensively grazed arid sites. We show the possibility of using grassland models to determine sound mitigation practices while quantifying the uncertainties associated with the simulated outputs. 2018-11 2018-08-24T11:43:32Z 2018-08-24T11:43:32Z Journal Article Sándor, R., Ehrhardt, F., Brilli, L., Carozzi, M., Recous, S., Smith, P., Snow, V., Soussana, J.-F., Dorich, C.D., Fuchs, K., Fitton, N., Gongadze, K., Klumpp, K., Liebig, M., Martin, R., Merbold, L., Newton, P.C.D., Rees, R.M., Rolinski, S. and Bellocchi, G. 2018. The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands. Science of The Total Environment 642: 292-306. 0048-9697 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/96899 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.020 en All rights reserved; no re-use allowed Limited Access p. 292-306 Elsevier Science of The Total Environment
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic animal feeding
livestock
nitrogen fixation
pollution
environmental engineering
animal feeding
livestock
nitrogen fixation
pollution
environmental engineering
spellingShingle animal feeding
livestock
nitrogen fixation
pollution
environmental engineering
animal feeding
livestock
nitrogen fixation
pollution
environmental engineering
Sándor, R.
Ehrhardt, F.
Brilli, L.
Carozzi, M.
Recous, S.
Smith, P.
Snow, V.
Soussana, J.-F.
Dorich, C.D.
Fuchs, K.
Fitton, N.
Gongadze, K.
Klumpp, K.
Liebig, M.
Martin, R.
Merbold, Lutz
Newton, Paul C.D.
Rees, R.M.
Rolinski, Susanne
Bellocchi, G.
The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands
description Simulation models quantify the impacts on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling in grasslandsystems caused by changes in management practices. To support agricultural policies, it is however important to contrast the responses of alternative models, which can differ greatly in their treatment of key processes and in their response to management. We applied eight biogeochemical models at five grassland sites (in France, New Zealand, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States) to compare the sensitivity of modelled C and N fluxes to changes in the density of grazing animals (from 100% to 50% of the original livestock densities), also in combination with decreasing N fertilization levels (reduced to zero from the initial levels). Simulated multi-model median values indicated that input reduction would lead to an increase in the C sink strength (negative net ecosystem C exchange) in intensive grazing systems: −64 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (animal density reduction) and −81 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1(N and animal density reduction), against the baseline of −30.5 ± 69.5 g C m−2 yr−1 (LSU [livestock units] ≥ 0.76 ha−1 yr−1). Simulations also indicated a strong effect of N fertilizer reduction on N fluxes, e.g. N2O-N emissions decreased from 0.34 ± 0.22 (baseline) to 0.1 ± 0.05 g N m−2 yr−1 (no N fertilization). Simulated decline in grazing intensity had only limited impact on the N balance. The simulated pattern of enteric methane emissions was dominated by high model-to-model variability. The reduction in simulated offtake (animal intake + cut biomass) led to a doubling in net primary production per animal (increased by 11.6 ± 8.1 t C LSU−1 yr−1 across sites). The highest N2O-N intensities (N2O-N/offtake) were simulated at mown and extensively grazed arid sites. We show the possibility of using grassland models to determine sound mitigation practices while quantifying the uncertainties associated with the simulated outputs.
format Journal Article
topic_facet animal feeding
livestock
nitrogen fixation
pollution
environmental engineering
author Sándor, R.
Ehrhardt, F.
Brilli, L.
Carozzi, M.
Recous, S.
Smith, P.
Snow, V.
Soussana, J.-F.
Dorich, C.D.
Fuchs, K.
Fitton, N.
Gongadze, K.
Klumpp, K.
Liebig, M.
Martin, R.
Merbold, Lutz
Newton, Paul C.D.
Rees, R.M.
Rolinski, Susanne
Bellocchi, G.
author_facet Sándor, R.
Ehrhardt, F.
Brilli, L.
Carozzi, M.
Recous, S.
Smith, P.
Snow, V.
Soussana, J.-F.
Dorich, C.D.
Fuchs, K.
Fitton, N.
Gongadze, K.
Klumpp, K.
Liebig, M.
Martin, R.
Merbold, Lutz
Newton, Paul C.D.
Rees, R.M.
Rolinski, Susanne
Bellocchi, G.
author_sort Sándor, R.
title The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands
title_short The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands
title_full The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands
title_fullStr The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands
title_full_unstemmed The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands
title_sort use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2018-11
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/96899
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.020
work_keys_str_mv AT sandorr theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT ehrhardtf theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT brillil theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT carozzim theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT recouss theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT smithp theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT snowv theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT soussanajf theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT dorichcd theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT fuchsk theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT fittonn theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT gongadzek theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT klumppk theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT liebigm theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT martinr theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT merboldlutz theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT newtonpaulcd theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT reesrm theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT rolinskisusanne theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT bellocchig theuseofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT sandorr useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT ehrhardtf useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT brillil useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT carozzim useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT recouss useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT smithp useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT snowv useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT soussanajf useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT dorichcd useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT fuchsk useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT fittonn useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT gongadzek useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT klumppk useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT liebigm useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT martinr useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT merboldlutz useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT newtonpaulcd useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT reesrm useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT rolinskisusanne useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
AT bellocchig useofbiogeochemicalmodelstoevaluatemitigationofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanagedgrasslands
_version_ 1787228477100916736