The problem is the message

René Rabezandrina, of the Department of Agriculture at the University of Antananarivo, Madagascar, comments on the 'Viewpoint' about extension work which appeared in Spore 72, p. 11. 'A lot of participatory methods such as wide extension or mass extension, pilot farmer-centred approaches or contact groups (training and visits), have been designed by very skilled leaders (experts in large international organisations) for passing on to extension staff who, in turn, put them into practice in their work. It cannot be said that African farmers are any less aware than other farmers, or unable to know where their own interests lie. Further, if we judge that extension workers ? the 'transmitters' - are intelligent people, and that the methods adopted and supported by the specialists cannot all be bad, and that the farmers ? the 'receivers' ? are not particularly obtuse, then we have to ask ourselves where the problem lies. For the last thirty years we have worked away looking for the way to pass on the message, whilst the real problem lies precisely there: the message is not interesting enough for the farmer to take it on board definitively. It follows that the answer is not to be found in yet another new training programme for extension staff, without any guarantee that it will work, but in finding messages which will satisfy the heart-felt wish of the farmer: to work less physically, whilst earning more. Look at subjects like agroforestry using profitable fruit trees, or planting sugar cane, which can have a very high added value. These have never been promoted by official extension agents, but the Malagasy farmer has taken them up spontaneously. You cannot say the same about techniques for planting out rice in lines or manual weeding with a hoe, work that would have the rice farmer hoeing for hundreds of kilometres just to weed one hectare ? if he were to follow the advice of the extension agent.'

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
Format: News Item biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation 1998
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/48157
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/99626
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-48157
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-481572021-02-24T07:16:29Z The problem is the message Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation René Rabezandrina, of the Department of Agriculture at the University of Antananarivo, Madagascar, comments on the 'Viewpoint' about extension work which appeared in Spore 72, p. 11. 'A lot of participatory methods such as wide extension or mass extension, pilot farmer-centred approaches or contact groups (training and visits), have been designed by very skilled leaders (experts in large international organisations) for passing on to extension staff who, in turn, put them into practice in their work. It cannot be said that African farmers are any less aware than other farmers, or unable to know where their own interests lie. Further, if we judge that extension workers ? the 'transmitters' - are intelligent people, and that the methods adopted and supported by the specialists cannot all be bad, and that the farmers ? the 'receivers' ? are not particularly obtuse, then we have to ask ourselves where the problem lies. For the last thirty years we have worked away looking for the way to pass on the message, whilst the real problem lies precisely there: the message is not interesting enough for the farmer to take it on board definitively. It follows that the answer is not to be found in yet another new training programme for extension staff, without any guarantee that it will work, but in finding messages which will satisfy the heart-felt wish of the farmer: to work less physically, whilst earning more. Look at subjects like agroforestry using profitable fruit trees, or planting sugar cane, which can have a very high added value. These have never been promoted by official extension agents, but the Malagasy farmer has taken them up spontaneously. You cannot say the same about techniques for planting out rice in lines or manual weeding with a hoe, work that would have the rice farmer hoeing for hundreds of kilometres just to weed one hectare ? if he were to follow the advice of the extension agent.' René Rabezandrina, of the Department of Agriculture at the University of Antananarivo, Madagascar, comments on the 'Viewpoint' about extension work which appeared in Spore 72, p. 11. 'A lot of participatory methods such as wide extension or mass... 1998 2014-10-16T09:14:03Z 2014-10-16T09:14:03Z News Item CTA. 1998. The problem is the message . Spore 76. CTA, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 1011-0054 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/48157 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/99626 en Spore Open Access Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation Spore
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
description René Rabezandrina, of the Department of Agriculture at the University of Antananarivo, Madagascar, comments on the 'Viewpoint' about extension work which appeared in Spore 72, p. 11. 'A lot of participatory methods such as wide extension or mass extension, pilot farmer-centred approaches or contact groups (training and visits), have been designed by very skilled leaders (experts in large international organisations) for passing on to extension staff who, in turn, put them into practice in their work. It cannot be said that African farmers are any less aware than other farmers, or unable to know where their own interests lie. Further, if we judge that extension workers ? the 'transmitters' - are intelligent people, and that the methods adopted and supported by the specialists cannot all be bad, and that the farmers ? the 'receivers' ? are not particularly obtuse, then we have to ask ourselves where the problem lies. For the last thirty years we have worked away looking for the way to pass on the message, whilst the real problem lies precisely there: the message is not interesting enough for the farmer to take it on board definitively. It follows that the answer is not to be found in yet another new training programme for extension staff, without any guarantee that it will work, but in finding messages which will satisfy the heart-felt wish of the farmer: to work less physically, whilst earning more. Look at subjects like agroforestry using profitable fruit trees, or planting sugar cane, which can have a very high added value. These have never been promoted by official extension agents, but the Malagasy farmer has taken them up spontaneously. You cannot say the same about techniques for planting out rice in lines or manual weeding with a hoe, work that would have the rice farmer hoeing for hundreds of kilometres just to weed one hectare ? if he were to follow the advice of the extension agent.'
format News Item
author Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
spellingShingle Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
The problem is the message
author_facet Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
author_sort Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
title The problem is the message
title_short The problem is the message
title_full The problem is the message
title_fullStr The problem is the message
title_full_unstemmed The problem is the message
title_sort problem is the message
publisher Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
publishDate 1998
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/48157
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/99626
work_keys_str_mv AT technicalcentreforagriculturalandruralcooperation theproblemisthemessage
AT technicalcentreforagriculturalandruralcooperation problemisthemessage
_version_ 1779052970600562688