An assessment of integrated Striga hermonthica control and early adoption by farmers in Northern Nigeria

Two sets of on-farm trials, each covering two years, were conducted in the northern Guinea savannah of Nigeria over the period 1999–2001, the objective being to compare integrated Striga hermonthica control measures (soybean or cowpea trap crops followed by maize resistant to Striga) with farmers' traditional cereal-based cropping systems. In both sets of trials, this proved to be highly effective in increasing productivity over the two year period, especially where soybean was used as a trap crop. Resistant maize after a trap crop increased the net benefit over the two cropping seasons in both trials by over 100% over farmer practice. However, in the second set of trials there was no significant increase in productivity between a trap crop followed by Striga resistant maize, and a trap crop followed by local maize especially where legume intercropping and fertilizer had been applied in the farmer practice. There was also no increase in productivity between two years' traditional cereal cropping and one year's local maize followed by Striga resistant maize. This indicates the importance of a legume trap crop in the first year in order to ensure high productivity in the second year, regardless of variety. Up to 20% of farmers obtained higher productivity from their own practices, notably intercropping of cereals with legumes and use of inorganic fertilizers. Leguminous trap crops and Striga resistant maize, together with two key management practices (increased soybean planting density and hand-roguing) were seen to be spreading both within and beyond the research villages, indicating that farmers see the economic benefits of controlling Striga. Survey findings show that explaining the reasons why control practices work can greatly increase the adoption of these practices. Wider adoption of Striga control will therefore require an extension approach that provides this training as well as encouraging farmers to experiment and adapt Striga control options for their local farming systems.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ellis-Jones, J., Schulz, S., Douthwaite, Boru, Hussaini, M.A., Oyewole, BD, Olanrewaju, AS, White, R
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2004-07
Subjects:feed crops, striga hermonthica, parasitic plants, weed control, zea mays, maize, on-farm research, farmers, innovation adoption, trap crops, plantas parásitas, control de malezas, maíz, investigación en la finca, agricultores, adopción de innovaciones, cultivos trampa,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/43173
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479704001802
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-43173
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-431732023-12-08T19:36:04Z An assessment of integrated Striga hermonthica control and early adoption by farmers in Northern Nigeria Ellis-Jones, J. Schulz, S. Douthwaite, Boru Hussaini, M.A. Oyewole, BD Olanrewaju, AS White, R feed crops striga hermonthica parasitic plants weed control zea mays maize on-farm research farmers innovation adoption trap crops plantas parásitas control de malezas maíz investigación en la finca agricultores adopción de innovaciones cultivos trampa Two sets of on-farm trials, each covering two years, were conducted in the northern Guinea savannah of Nigeria over the period 1999–2001, the objective being to compare integrated Striga hermonthica control measures (soybean or cowpea trap crops followed by maize resistant to Striga) with farmers' traditional cereal-based cropping systems. In both sets of trials, this proved to be highly effective in increasing productivity over the two year period, especially where soybean was used as a trap crop. Resistant maize after a trap crop increased the net benefit over the two cropping seasons in both trials by over 100% over farmer practice. However, in the second set of trials there was no significant increase in productivity between a trap crop followed by Striga resistant maize, and a trap crop followed by local maize especially where legume intercropping and fertilizer had been applied in the farmer practice. There was also no increase in productivity between two years' traditional cereal cropping and one year's local maize followed by Striga resistant maize. This indicates the importance of a legume trap crop in the first year in order to ensure high productivity in the second year, regardless of variety. Up to 20% of farmers obtained higher productivity from their own practices, notably intercropping of cereals with legumes and use of inorganic fertilizers. Leguminous trap crops and Striga resistant maize, together with two key management practices (increased soybean planting density and hand-roguing) were seen to be spreading both within and beyond the research villages, indicating that farmers see the economic benefits of controlling Striga. Survey findings show that explaining the reasons why control practices work can greatly increase the adoption of these practices. Wider adoption of Striga control will therefore require an extension approach that provides this training as well as encouraging farmers to experiment and adapt Striga control options for their local farming systems. 2004-07 2014-09-24T08:41:44Z 2014-09-24T08:41:44Z Journal Article 1469-4441 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/43173 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479704001802 en Limited Access Cambridge University Press Experimental Agriculture
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic feed crops
striga hermonthica
parasitic plants
weed control
zea mays
maize
on-farm research
farmers
innovation adoption
trap crops
plantas parásitas
control de malezas
maíz
investigación en la finca
agricultores
adopción de innovaciones
cultivos trampa
feed crops
striga hermonthica
parasitic plants
weed control
zea mays
maize
on-farm research
farmers
innovation adoption
trap crops
plantas parásitas
control de malezas
maíz
investigación en la finca
agricultores
adopción de innovaciones
cultivos trampa
spellingShingle feed crops
striga hermonthica
parasitic plants
weed control
zea mays
maize
on-farm research
farmers
innovation adoption
trap crops
plantas parásitas
control de malezas
maíz
investigación en la finca
agricultores
adopción de innovaciones
cultivos trampa
feed crops
striga hermonthica
parasitic plants
weed control
zea mays
maize
on-farm research
farmers
innovation adoption
trap crops
plantas parásitas
control de malezas
maíz
investigación en la finca
agricultores
adopción de innovaciones
cultivos trampa
Ellis-Jones, J.
Schulz, S.
Douthwaite, Boru
Hussaini, M.A.
Oyewole, BD
Olanrewaju, AS
White, R
An assessment of integrated Striga hermonthica control and early adoption by farmers in Northern Nigeria
description Two sets of on-farm trials, each covering two years, were conducted in the northern Guinea savannah of Nigeria over the period 1999–2001, the objective being to compare integrated Striga hermonthica control measures (soybean or cowpea trap crops followed by maize resistant to Striga) with farmers' traditional cereal-based cropping systems. In both sets of trials, this proved to be highly effective in increasing productivity over the two year period, especially where soybean was used as a trap crop. Resistant maize after a trap crop increased the net benefit over the two cropping seasons in both trials by over 100% over farmer practice. However, in the second set of trials there was no significant increase in productivity between a trap crop followed by Striga resistant maize, and a trap crop followed by local maize especially where legume intercropping and fertilizer had been applied in the farmer practice. There was also no increase in productivity between two years' traditional cereal cropping and one year's local maize followed by Striga resistant maize. This indicates the importance of a legume trap crop in the first year in order to ensure high productivity in the second year, regardless of variety. Up to 20% of farmers obtained higher productivity from their own practices, notably intercropping of cereals with legumes and use of inorganic fertilizers. Leguminous trap crops and Striga resistant maize, together with two key management practices (increased soybean planting density and hand-roguing) were seen to be spreading both within and beyond the research villages, indicating that farmers see the economic benefits of controlling Striga. Survey findings show that explaining the reasons why control practices work can greatly increase the adoption of these practices. Wider adoption of Striga control will therefore require an extension approach that provides this training as well as encouraging farmers to experiment and adapt Striga control options for their local farming systems.
format Journal Article
topic_facet feed crops
striga hermonthica
parasitic plants
weed control
zea mays
maize
on-farm research
farmers
innovation adoption
trap crops
plantas parásitas
control de malezas
maíz
investigación en la finca
agricultores
adopción de innovaciones
cultivos trampa
author Ellis-Jones, J.
Schulz, S.
Douthwaite, Boru
Hussaini, M.A.
Oyewole, BD
Olanrewaju, AS
White, R
author_facet Ellis-Jones, J.
Schulz, S.
Douthwaite, Boru
Hussaini, M.A.
Oyewole, BD
Olanrewaju, AS
White, R
author_sort Ellis-Jones, J.
title An assessment of integrated Striga hermonthica control and early adoption by farmers in Northern Nigeria
title_short An assessment of integrated Striga hermonthica control and early adoption by farmers in Northern Nigeria
title_full An assessment of integrated Striga hermonthica control and early adoption by farmers in Northern Nigeria
title_fullStr An assessment of integrated Striga hermonthica control and early adoption by farmers in Northern Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of integrated Striga hermonthica control and early adoption by farmers in Northern Nigeria
title_sort assessment of integrated striga hermonthica control and early adoption by farmers in northern nigeria
publisher Cambridge University Press
publishDate 2004-07
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/43173
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479704001802
work_keys_str_mv AT ellisjonesj anassessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT schulzs anassessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT douthwaiteboru anassessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT hussainima anassessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT oyewolebd anassessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT olanrewajuas anassessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT whiter anassessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT ellisjonesj assessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT schulzs assessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT douthwaiteboru assessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT hussainima assessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT oyewolebd assessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT olanrewajuas assessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
AT whiter assessmentofintegratedstrigahermonthicacontrolandearlyadoptionbyfarmersinnorthernnigeria
_version_ 1787230492735569920