Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)

A rapid, visually read, dot-ELISA developed for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in tsetse flies (Glossina spp.), was field tested alongside the standard fly dissection method on a ranch in south eastern Kenya. Of 104 G. pallidipes dissected, 2 were found to be infected with trypanosomes in their midguts. By the dissection method the infecting trypanosome species could not be identified, as both flies had no salivary gland infections. However, using the dot-ELISA, the 2 flies were shown to be infected with Trypanosoma congolense in their midguts. The midguts of an additional 6 (5.8 percent) of the 104j G. pallidipes tested positive for T. congolense in the dot-ELISA, even though no trypanosomes were seen on dissection. The infection rate for this fly species as determined using the dot-ELISA, therefore was 7.7 percent for T. congolense in midgut infections compared to 1.9 percent identified by fly dissection. The salivary glands and mouthparts of the 6 additional tsetse flies identified by dot-ELISA were all negative as determined by the 2 techniques. None of 390 G. longipennis flies dissected and examined for trypanosomes in the midgut, salivary glands and mouthparts was shown by this method, to be infected. Using the dot-ELISA, however, 17 (4.4 percent) of the flies tested positive for T. congolense in the midgut, whilst the salivary glands and mouthparts of the same flies were negative. Thus, the dot-ELISA appears to be more sensitive than the fly dissection method under field conditions. Moreover, the dot-ELISA can be performed in the field without electricity. It is simple to perform, and was not affected by high ambient temperatures (22-32 degree centigrade) or by contamination of reactants with dust.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bosompem, K.M., Masake, R.A., Assoku, R.K.G., Opiyo, E.A., Nantulya, V.M.
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 1996-02
Subjects:trypanosomes (phytomonas), glossinidae, evaluation, infection, monoclonal antibodies, elisa, infectious diseases, parasitology,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/29386
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000084778
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-29386
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-293862023-12-08T19:36:04Z Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.) Bosompem, K.M. Masake, R.A. Assoku, R.K.G. Opiyo, E.A. Nantulya, V.M. trypanosomes (phytomonas) glossinidae evaluation infection monoclonal antibodies elisa infectious diseases parasitology A rapid, visually read, dot-ELISA developed for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in tsetse flies (Glossina spp.), was field tested alongside the standard fly dissection method on a ranch in south eastern Kenya. Of 104 G. pallidipes dissected, 2 were found to be infected with trypanosomes in their midguts. By the dissection method the infecting trypanosome species could not be identified, as both flies had no salivary gland infections. However, using the dot-ELISA, the 2 flies were shown to be infected with Trypanosoma congolense in their midguts. The midguts of an additional 6 (5.8 percent) of the 104j G. pallidipes tested positive for T. congolense in the dot-ELISA, even though no trypanosomes were seen on dissection. The infection rate for this fly species as determined using the dot-ELISA, therefore was 7.7 percent for T. congolense in midgut infections compared to 1.9 percent identified by fly dissection. The salivary glands and mouthparts of the 6 additional tsetse flies identified by dot-ELISA were all negative as determined by the 2 techniques. None of 390 G. longipennis flies dissected and examined for trypanosomes in the midgut, salivary glands and mouthparts was shown by this method, to be infected. Using the dot-ELISA, however, 17 (4.4 percent) of the flies tested positive for T. congolense in the midgut, whilst the salivary glands and mouthparts of the same flies were negative. Thus, the dot-ELISA appears to be more sensitive than the fly dissection method under field conditions. Moreover, the dot-ELISA can be performed in the field without electricity. It is simple to perform, and was not affected by high ambient temperatures (22-32 degree centigrade) or by contamination of reactants with dust. 1996-02 2013-06-11T09:23:23Z 2013-06-11T09:23:23Z Journal Article Parasitology;112: 205-211 0031-1820 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/29386 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000084778 en Limited Access p. 205-211 Cambridge University Press Parasitology
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic trypanosomes (phytomonas)
glossinidae
evaluation
infection
monoclonal antibodies
elisa
infectious diseases
parasitology
trypanosomes (phytomonas)
glossinidae
evaluation
infection
monoclonal antibodies
elisa
infectious diseases
parasitology
spellingShingle trypanosomes (phytomonas)
glossinidae
evaluation
infection
monoclonal antibodies
elisa
infectious diseases
parasitology
trypanosomes (phytomonas)
glossinidae
evaluation
infection
monoclonal antibodies
elisa
infectious diseases
parasitology
Bosompem, K.M.
Masake, R.A.
Assoku, R.K.G.
Opiyo, E.A.
Nantulya, V.M.
Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
description A rapid, visually read, dot-ELISA developed for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in tsetse flies (Glossina spp.), was field tested alongside the standard fly dissection method on a ranch in south eastern Kenya. Of 104 G. pallidipes dissected, 2 were found to be infected with trypanosomes in their midguts. By the dissection method the infecting trypanosome species could not be identified, as both flies had no salivary gland infections. However, using the dot-ELISA, the 2 flies were shown to be infected with Trypanosoma congolense in their midguts. The midguts of an additional 6 (5.8 percent) of the 104j G. pallidipes tested positive for T. congolense in the dot-ELISA, even though no trypanosomes were seen on dissection. The infection rate for this fly species as determined using the dot-ELISA, therefore was 7.7 percent for T. congolense in midgut infections compared to 1.9 percent identified by fly dissection. The salivary glands and mouthparts of the 6 additional tsetse flies identified by dot-ELISA were all negative as determined by the 2 techniques. None of 390 G. longipennis flies dissected and examined for trypanosomes in the midgut, salivary glands and mouthparts was shown by this method, to be infected. Using the dot-ELISA, however, 17 (4.4 percent) of the flies tested positive for T. congolense in the midgut, whilst the salivary glands and mouthparts of the same flies were negative. Thus, the dot-ELISA appears to be more sensitive than the fly dissection method under field conditions. Moreover, the dot-ELISA can be performed in the field without electricity. It is simple to perform, and was not affected by high ambient temperatures (22-32 degree centigrade) or by contamination of reactants with dust.
format Journal Article
topic_facet trypanosomes (phytomonas)
glossinidae
evaluation
infection
monoclonal antibodies
elisa
infectious diseases
parasitology
author Bosompem, K.M.
Masake, R.A.
Assoku, R.K.G.
Opiyo, E.A.
Nantulya, V.M.
author_facet Bosompem, K.M.
Masake, R.A.
Assoku, R.K.G.
Opiyo, E.A.
Nantulya, V.M.
author_sort Bosompem, K.M.
title Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
title_short Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
title_full Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
title_fullStr Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
title_full_unstemmed Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
title_sort field evaluation of a dot-elisa for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (glossina spp.)
publisher Cambridge University Press
publishDate 1996-02
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/29386
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000084778
work_keys_str_mv AT bosompemkm fieldevaluationofadotelisaforthedetectionanddifferentiationoftrypanosomespeciesininfectedtsetsefliesglossinaspp
AT masakera fieldevaluationofadotelisaforthedetectionanddifferentiationoftrypanosomespeciesininfectedtsetsefliesglossinaspp
AT assokurkg fieldevaluationofadotelisaforthedetectionanddifferentiationoftrypanosomespeciesininfectedtsetsefliesglossinaspp
AT opiyoea fieldevaluationofadotelisaforthedetectionanddifferentiationoftrypanosomespeciesininfectedtsetsefliesglossinaspp
AT nantulyavm fieldevaluationofadotelisaforthedetectionanddifferentiationoftrypanosomespeciesininfectedtsetsefliesglossinaspp
_version_ 1787228157707812864