Effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (Zea mays) based rotations
In recent years, increasing water and labor scarcity & production cost, decreasing farm profitability and climatechange- induced variability are major challenges faced by the farmers of Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) in South Asia. Conservation agriculture (CA) based best-bet crop management practices may increase crop productivity, profitability and conserve the natural resources. In a 2-year (2012-2014) study, we assessed the effects of six combinations of tillage and crop establishment (TCE) and residue management options on crop & water productivity, profitability and soil thermal and moisture regimes in maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (MW) and maize-chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (MC) rotations in Western IGP of India. The treatments consisted of both crops sown on permanent raised beds with residue (PB+R) and without residue (PB-R); zero tilled flat with residue (ZT+R) and without residue (ZT-R) and conventional tilled flat with residue (CT+R) and without residue (CT-R). Overall, 2-year mean maize, wheat and chickpea grain/seed yield was found to be 17.0-23.2, 20.8-24.8 and 22-31.7% higher under CA-based PB+R/ZT+R than CT-R, but it was 5.3-10.9, 4.9-8.4 and 13.8-22.8% higher than CT+R, respectively. The yield of maize, wheat and chickpea was significantly (P<0.05) higher in CA-based PB+R and ZT+R systems compared to CT-R right from first year onwards. The MW and MC, 2-year mean system productivity (based on maize equivalent yield- MEY) was higher by 21.1-21.9 and 18.7-27.5% in CA-based systems (PB+R & ZT+R) than in the CT-R, respectively. CA-based PB+R and ZT+R practices reduced the total system water use in MW and MC rotations by 75-112 mm and 55-90 mm and resulted enhanced system water productivity (WP) compared to CT-R system. Irrespective of crop rotations and TCE practices residue management treatments enhances the soil moisture (in the range of 14.5 to 30.4% during winter and monsoon seasons) and also moderates the soil temperatures. Economic profit for MW and MC rotations was always significantly (P<0.05) higher (168-445 and 215-619 US$/ha/year) in CA-based systems than in CT-R. Findings of our study shows that MW and MC rotations under CA-based system is one of the way for improving crop productivity, WP and farm income with less risk of extreme temperature and moisture stress while sustaining the natural resources in Western IGP of India and other similar agro-ecologies of South Asia.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019-02-01
|
Subjects: | agriculture, climate change, food security, conservation agriculture, soil moisture, cropping systems, |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/106103 https://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/27288 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cgspace-10568-106103 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cgspace-10568-1061032023-08-08T07:21:25Z Effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (Zea mays) based rotations Parihar, Muli D Parihar, Chiter Mal Nanwal, Rajendra K Singh, Aditya K. Jat, Shankar Lal Nayak, Harisankar Ghasal, Prakash C Jewlia, Hem R Choudhary, Mukesh Jat, Mangi Lal agriculture climate change food security conservation agriculture soil moisture cropping systems In recent years, increasing water and labor scarcity & production cost, decreasing farm profitability and climatechange- induced variability are major challenges faced by the farmers of Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) in South Asia. Conservation agriculture (CA) based best-bet crop management practices may increase crop productivity, profitability and conserve the natural resources. In a 2-year (2012-2014) study, we assessed the effects of six combinations of tillage and crop establishment (TCE) and residue management options on crop & water productivity, profitability and soil thermal and moisture regimes in maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (MW) and maize-chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (MC) rotations in Western IGP of India. The treatments consisted of both crops sown on permanent raised beds with residue (PB+R) and without residue (PB-R); zero tilled flat with residue (ZT+R) and without residue (ZT-R) and conventional tilled flat with residue (CT+R) and without residue (CT-R). Overall, 2-year mean maize, wheat and chickpea grain/seed yield was found to be 17.0-23.2, 20.8-24.8 and 22-31.7% higher under CA-based PB+R/ZT+R than CT-R, but it was 5.3-10.9, 4.9-8.4 and 13.8-22.8% higher than CT+R, respectively. The yield of maize, wheat and chickpea was significantly (P<0.05) higher in CA-based PB+R and ZT+R systems compared to CT-R right from first year onwards. The MW and MC, 2-year mean system productivity (based on maize equivalent yield- MEY) was higher by 21.1-21.9 and 18.7-27.5% in CA-based systems (PB+R & ZT+R) than in the CT-R, respectively. CA-based PB+R and ZT+R practices reduced the total system water use in MW and MC rotations by 75-112 mm and 55-90 mm and resulted enhanced system water productivity (WP) compared to CT-R system. Irrespective of crop rotations and TCE practices residue management treatments enhances the soil moisture (in the range of 14.5 to 30.4% during winter and monsoon seasons) and also moderates the soil temperatures. Economic profit for MW and MC rotations was always significantly (P<0.05) higher (168-445 and 215-619 US$/ha/year) in CA-based systems than in CT-R. Findings of our study shows that MW and MC rotations under CA-based system is one of the way for improving crop productivity, WP and farm income with less risk of extreme temperature and moisture stress while sustaining the natural resources in Western IGP of India and other similar agro-ecologies of South Asia. 2019-02-01 2019-12-10T19:54:07Z 2019-12-10T19:54:07Z Journal Article Parihar MD, Parihar CM, Nanwal RK, Singh AK, Jat SL, Nayak HS, Ghasal PC, Jewlia HR, Choudhary M, Jat ML. Effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (Zea mays) based rotations. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 89(2):192-198. 0019-5022 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/106103 https://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/27288 en CC-BY-NC-4.0 Open Access 192-198 Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences |
institution |
CGIAR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cgspace |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CGIAR |
language |
English |
topic |
agriculture climate change food security conservation agriculture soil moisture cropping systems agriculture climate change food security conservation agriculture soil moisture cropping systems |
spellingShingle |
agriculture climate change food security conservation agriculture soil moisture cropping systems agriculture climate change food security conservation agriculture soil moisture cropping systems Parihar, Muli D Parihar, Chiter Mal Nanwal, Rajendra K Singh, Aditya K. Jat, Shankar Lal Nayak, Harisankar Ghasal, Prakash C Jewlia, Hem R Choudhary, Mukesh Jat, Mangi Lal Effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (Zea mays) based rotations |
description |
In recent years, increasing water and labor scarcity & production cost, decreasing farm profitability and climatechange-
induced variability are major challenges faced by the farmers of Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) in South Asia.
Conservation agriculture (CA) based best-bet crop management practices may increase crop productivity, profitability
and conserve the natural resources. In a 2-year (2012-2014) study, we assessed the effects of six combinations of tillage
and crop establishment (TCE) and residue management options on crop & water productivity, profitability and soil
thermal and moisture regimes in maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (MW) and maize-chickpea (Cicer
arietinum L.) (MC) rotations in Western IGP of India. The treatments consisted of both crops sown on permanent raised
beds with residue (PB+R) and without residue (PB-R); zero tilled flat with residue (ZT+R) and without residue (ZT-R)
and conventional tilled flat with residue (CT+R) and without residue (CT-R). Overall, 2-year mean maize, wheat and
chickpea grain/seed yield was found to be 17.0-23.2, 20.8-24.8 and 22-31.7% higher under CA-based PB+R/ZT+R
than CT-R, but it was 5.3-10.9, 4.9-8.4 and 13.8-22.8% higher than CT+R, respectively. The yield of maize, wheat
and chickpea was significantly (P<0.05) higher in CA-based PB+R and ZT+R systems compared to CT-R right from
first year onwards. The MW and MC, 2-year mean system productivity (based on maize equivalent yield- MEY) was
higher by 21.1-21.9 and 18.7-27.5% in CA-based systems (PB+R & ZT+R) than in the CT-R, respectively. CA-based
PB+R and ZT+R practices reduced the total system water use in MW and MC rotations by 75-112 mm and 55-90
mm and resulted enhanced system water productivity (WP) compared to CT-R system. Irrespective of crop rotations
and TCE practices residue management treatments enhances the soil moisture (in the range of 14.5 to 30.4% during
winter and monsoon seasons) and also moderates the soil temperatures. Economic profit for MW and MC rotations
was always significantly (P<0.05) higher (168-445 and 215-619 US$/ha/year) in CA-based systems than in CT-R.
Findings of our study shows that MW and MC rotations under CA-based system is one of the way for improving
crop productivity, WP and farm income with less risk of extreme temperature and moisture stress while sustaining
the natural resources in Western IGP of India and other similar agro-ecologies of South Asia. |
format |
Journal Article |
topic_facet |
agriculture climate change food security conservation agriculture soil moisture cropping systems |
author |
Parihar, Muli D Parihar, Chiter Mal Nanwal, Rajendra K Singh, Aditya K. Jat, Shankar Lal Nayak, Harisankar Ghasal, Prakash C Jewlia, Hem R Choudhary, Mukesh Jat, Mangi Lal |
author_facet |
Parihar, Muli D Parihar, Chiter Mal Nanwal, Rajendra K Singh, Aditya K. Jat, Shankar Lal Nayak, Harisankar Ghasal, Prakash C Jewlia, Hem R Choudhary, Mukesh Jat, Mangi Lal |
author_sort |
Parihar, Muli D |
title |
Effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (Zea mays) based rotations |
title_short |
Effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (Zea mays) based rotations |
title_full |
Effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (Zea mays) based rotations |
title_fullStr |
Effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (Zea mays) based rotations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (Zea mays) based rotations |
title_sort |
effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (zea mays) based rotations |
publishDate |
2019-02-01 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/106103 https://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/27288 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pariharmulid effectofdifferenttillageandresiduemanagementpracticesoncropandwaterproductivityandeconomicsinmaizezeamaysbasedrotations AT pariharchitermal effectofdifferenttillageandresiduemanagementpracticesoncropandwaterproductivityandeconomicsinmaizezeamaysbasedrotations AT nanwalrajendrak effectofdifferenttillageandresiduemanagementpracticesoncropandwaterproductivityandeconomicsinmaizezeamaysbasedrotations AT singhadityak effectofdifferenttillageandresiduemanagementpracticesoncropandwaterproductivityandeconomicsinmaizezeamaysbasedrotations AT jatshankarlal effectofdifferenttillageandresiduemanagementpracticesoncropandwaterproductivityandeconomicsinmaizezeamaysbasedrotations AT nayakharisankar effectofdifferenttillageandresiduemanagementpracticesoncropandwaterproductivityandeconomicsinmaizezeamaysbasedrotations AT ghasalprakashc effectofdifferenttillageandresiduemanagementpracticesoncropandwaterproductivityandeconomicsinmaizezeamaysbasedrotations AT jewliahemr effectofdifferenttillageandresiduemanagementpracticesoncropandwaterproductivityandeconomicsinmaizezeamaysbasedrotations AT choudharymukesh effectofdifferenttillageandresiduemanagementpracticesoncropandwaterproductivityandeconomicsinmaizezeamaysbasedrotations AT jatmangilal effectofdifferenttillageandresiduemanagementpracticesoncropandwaterproductivityandeconomicsinmaizezeamaysbasedrotations |
_version_ |
1779060996315283456 |