Comparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids.

: Soil organic matter (SOM) plays a key role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycles. Soil biogeochemistry is regularly studied by extracting the base-soluble fractions of SOM: acidinsoluble humic acid (HA) and acid-soluble fulvic acid (FA). Electrospray ionization−Fourier transform−ion cyclotron resonance−mass spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR-MS) is commonly utilized for molecularly characterizing these fractions. Different sample preparation techniques exist for the analysis of HA and FA though questions remain regarding data comparability following different preparations. Comparisons of different sample preparation techniques here revealed that the negative-mode ESI-FT-ICRMS analytical window can be skewed to detect different groups of molecules, with primary differences in oxygenation, aromaticity, and molecular weight. It was also observed that HA and FA from soils versus an aquatic matrix behaved very differently. Thus, we conclude that sample preparation techniques determined to be ?most optimal? in our study are in no way universal. We recommend that future studies of HA and FA involve similar comparative studies for determining the most suitable sample preparation technique for their particular type of HA or FA matrices. This will enhance data comparability among different studies and environmental systems and ultimately allow us to better understand the complex composition of environmental matrices.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: GORANOV, A. I., TADINI, A. M., MARTIN NETO, L., BERNARDI, A. C. de C., PEZZOPANE, J. R. M., MILORI, D. M. B. P., MOUNIER, S., HATCHER, P. G.
Other Authors: LADISLAU MARTIN NETO, CNPDIA; ALBERTO CARLOS DE CAMPOS BERNARDI, CPPSE; JOSE RICARDO MACEDO PEZZOPANE, CPPSE; DEBORA MARCONDES BASTOS PEREIRA, CNPDIA.
Format: Artigo de periódico biblioteca
Language:Ingles
English
Published: 2022-09-28
Subjects:FT-ICR-MS, Organic matter characterization, Electrospray ionization, Data comparability,
Online Access:http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1146932
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01125
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-alice-doc-1146932
record_format koha
spelling dig-alice-doc-11469322022-09-28T18:06:13Z Comparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids. GORANOV, A. I. TADINI, A. M. MARTIN NETO, L. BERNARDI, A. C. de C. PEZZOPANE, J. R. M. MILORI, D. M. B. P. MOUNIER, S. HATCHER, P. G. LADISLAU MARTIN NETO, CNPDIA; ALBERTO CARLOS DE CAMPOS BERNARDI, CPPSE; JOSE RICARDO MACEDO PEZZOPANE, CPPSE; DEBORA MARCONDES BASTOS PEREIRA, CNPDIA. FT-ICR-MS Organic matter characterization Electrospray ionization Data comparability : Soil organic matter (SOM) plays a key role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycles. Soil biogeochemistry is regularly studied by extracting the base-soluble fractions of SOM: acidinsoluble humic acid (HA) and acid-soluble fulvic acid (FA). Electrospray ionization−Fourier transform−ion cyclotron resonance−mass spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR-MS) is commonly utilized for molecularly characterizing these fractions. Different sample preparation techniques exist for the analysis of HA and FA though questions remain regarding data comparability following different preparations. Comparisons of different sample preparation techniques here revealed that the negative-mode ESI-FT-ICRMS analytical window can be skewed to detect different groups of molecules, with primary differences in oxygenation, aromaticity, and molecular weight. It was also observed that HA and FA from soils versus an aquatic matrix behaved very differently. Thus, we conclude that sample preparation techniques determined to be ?most optimal? in our study are in no way universal. We recommend that future studies of HA and FA involve similar comparative studies for determining the most suitable sample preparation technique for their particular type of HA or FA matrices. This will enhance data comparability among different studies and environmental systems and ultimately allow us to better understand the complex composition of environmental matrices. 2022-09-28T18:06:04Z 2022-09-28T18:06:04Z 2022-09-28 2022 Artigo de periódico Environmental Science & Technology, v. 56, 2022. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1146932 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01125 Ingles en openAccess 12688 - 12701
institution EMBRAPA
collection DSpace
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-alice
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Sistema de bibliotecas de EMBRAPA
language Ingles
English
topic FT-ICR-MS
Organic matter characterization
Electrospray ionization
Data comparability
FT-ICR-MS
Organic matter characterization
Electrospray ionization
Data comparability
spellingShingle FT-ICR-MS
Organic matter characterization
Electrospray ionization
Data comparability
FT-ICR-MS
Organic matter characterization
Electrospray ionization
Data comparability
GORANOV, A. I.
TADINI, A. M.
MARTIN NETO, L.
BERNARDI, A. C. de C.
PEZZOPANE, J. R. M.
MILORI, D. M. B. P.
MOUNIER, S.
HATCHER, P. G.
Comparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids.
description : Soil organic matter (SOM) plays a key role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycles. Soil biogeochemistry is regularly studied by extracting the base-soluble fractions of SOM: acidinsoluble humic acid (HA) and acid-soluble fulvic acid (FA). Electrospray ionization−Fourier transform−ion cyclotron resonance−mass spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR-MS) is commonly utilized for molecularly characterizing these fractions. Different sample preparation techniques exist for the analysis of HA and FA though questions remain regarding data comparability following different preparations. Comparisons of different sample preparation techniques here revealed that the negative-mode ESI-FT-ICRMS analytical window can be skewed to detect different groups of molecules, with primary differences in oxygenation, aromaticity, and molecular weight. It was also observed that HA and FA from soils versus an aquatic matrix behaved very differently. Thus, we conclude that sample preparation techniques determined to be ?most optimal? in our study are in no way universal. We recommend that future studies of HA and FA involve similar comparative studies for determining the most suitable sample preparation technique for their particular type of HA or FA matrices. This will enhance data comparability among different studies and environmental systems and ultimately allow us to better understand the complex composition of environmental matrices.
author2 LADISLAU MARTIN NETO, CNPDIA; ALBERTO CARLOS DE CAMPOS BERNARDI, CPPSE; JOSE RICARDO MACEDO PEZZOPANE, CPPSE; DEBORA MARCONDES BASTOS PEREIRA, CNPDIA.
author_facet LADISLAU MARTIN NETO, CNPDIA; ALBERTO CARLOS DE CAMPOS BERNARDI, CPPSE; JOSE RICARDO MACEDO PEZZOPANE, CPPSE; DEBORA MARCONDES BASTOS PEREIRA, CNPDIA.
GORANOV, A. I.
TADINI, A. M.
MARTIN NETO, L.
BERNARDI, A. C. de C.
PEZZOPANE, J. R. M.
MILORI, D. M. B. P.
MOUNIER, S.
HATCHER, P. G.
format Artigo de periódico
topic_facet FT-ICR-MS
Organic matter characterization
Electrospray ionization
Data comparability
author GORANOV, A. I.
TADINI, A. M.
MARTIN NETO, L.
BERNARDI, A. C. de C.
PEZZOPANE, J. R. M.
MILORI, D. M. B. P.
MOUNIER, S.
HATCHER, P. G.
author_sort GORANOV, A. I.
title Comparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids.
title_short Comparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids.
title_full Comparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids.
title_fullStr Comparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids.
title_sort comparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)esi-ft-icr-ms analysis of humic and fulvic acids.
publishDate 2022-09-28
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1146932
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01125
work_keys_str_mv AT goranovai comparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesfortheesifticrmsanalysisofhumicandfulvicacids
AT tadiniam comparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesfortheesifticrmsanalysisofhumicandfulvicacids
AT martinnetol comparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesfortheesifticrmsanalysisofhumicandfulvicacids
AT bernardiacdec comparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesfortheesifticrmsanalysisofhumicandfulvicacids
AT pezzopanejrm comparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesfortheesifticrmsanalysisofhumicandfulvicacids
AT miloridmbp comparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesfortheesifticrmsanalysisofhumicandfulvicacids
AT mouniers comparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesfortheesifticrmsanalysisofhumicandfulvicacids
AT hatcherpg comparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesfortheesifticrmsanalysisofhumicandfulvicacids
_version_ 1756028698026311680