Do chitosan and its derivatives have the same protective effect on drought-contrasting maize genotypes? An analysis of physiological and production processes.

Water stress is among the most severe abiotic stress factors for maize production. The application of chitosan causes various responses in plants, as a function of its structure and concentration. Therefore, chemical modifications were proposed in this study to enhance the biological effects on plants. Hybrid maize plants with drought-contrasting characteristics, were subjected to water deficit and spraying with chitosan (CHI) and semi-synthesized chitosan derivatives, N‑Succinyl (SUC) and N,O‑Dicarboxymethyl (MCA). The obtained data show that the application of CHI and its derivatives (0.5 mg.plant-1 ) led to an increase in production for the two evaluated hybrids in comparison with the control under stress. Regarding leaf gas exchange, over the stress period, it was observed that the application of the MCA derivative yielded greater Pn than the other treatments in plants subjected to drought, in both hybrids. In the evaluation of chlorophyll content, there was an increase in this content through the application of CHI and its derivatives for both maize hybrids under study. With water recovery in plants, the water potential (Ψmd) of those treated with chitosan derivatives was greater than that of the irrigated control plants. In the quantification of proline concentration, higher values were observed in plants treated with MCA derivatives for the drought-sensitive hybrid. Chitosan derivatives, SUC and MCA, were responsible for higher starch concentrations in both maize hybrids. Evaluating the morphological characteristics of roots, the drought-tolerant hybrid showed higher means for all parameters evaluated when subjected to drought, and MCA was responsible for longer root length and greater mean root diameter. The results support the potential use of chitosan and its derivatives to increase tolerance to water deficit in maize.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: REIS, C. O. dos, MAGALHAES, P. C., AMBROSIO, A. dos S., ALMEIDA, L. G., CARVALHO, D. T., SOUZA, T. C, de
Other Authors: CAROLINE OLIVEIRA DOS REIS, Universidade Federal de Lavras; PAULO CESAR MAGALHAES, CNPMS; ALEXANDRA DOS SANTOS AMBRÓSIO, Universidade Federal de Alfenas; LORENA GABRIELA ALMEIDA, Universidade Federal de Lavras; DIOGO TEIXEIRA CARVALHO, Universidade Federal de Alfenas; THIAGO CORREA DE SOUZA, Universidade Federal de Alfenas.
Format: Artigo de periódico biblioteca
Language:Portugues
pt_BR
Published: 2022-07-13
Subjects:Quitosana, Milho, Seca,
Online Access:http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1144687
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-alice-doc-1144687
record_format koha
spelling dig-alice-doc-11446872022-07-13T16:19:31Z Do chitosan and its derivatives have the same protective effect on drought-contrasting maize genotypes? An analysis of physiological and production processes. REIS, C. O. dos MAGALHAES, P. C. AMBROSIO, A. dos S. ALMEIDA, L. G. CARVALHO, D. T. SOUZA, T. C, de CAROLINE OLIVEIRA DOS REIS, Universidade Federal de Lavras; PAULO CESAR MAGALHAES, CNPMS; ALEXANDRA DOS SANTOS AMBRÓSIO, Universidade Federal de Alfenas; LORENA GABRIELA ALMEIDA, Universidade Federal de Lavras; DIOGO TEIXEIRA CARVALHO, Universidade Federal de Alfenas; THIAGO CORREA DE SOUZA, Universidade Federal de Alfenas. Quitosana Milho Seca Water stress is among the most severe abiotic stress factors for maize production. The application of chitosan causes various responses in plants, as a function of its structure and concentration. Therefore, chemical modifications were proposed in this study to enhance the biological effects on plants. Hybrid maize plants with drought-contrasting characteristics, were subjected to water deficit and spraying with chitosan (CHI) and semi-synthesized chitosan derivatives, N‑Succinyl (SUC) and N,O‑Dicarboxymethyl (MCA). The obtained data show that the application of CHI and its derivatives (0.5 mg.plant-1 ) led to an increase in production for the two evaluated hybrids in comparison with the control under stress. Regarding leaf gas exchange, over the stress period, it was observed that the application of the MCA derivative yielded greater Pn than the other treatments in plants subjected to drought, in both hybrids. In the evaluation of chlorophyll content, there was an increase in this content through the application of CHI and its derivatives for both maize hybrids under study. With water recovery in plants, the water potential (Ψmd) of those treated with chitosan derivatives was greater than that of the irrigated control plants. In the quantification of proline concentration, higher values were observed in plants treated with MCA derivatives for the drought-sensitive hybrid. Chitosan derivatives, SUC and MCA, were responsible for higher starch concentrations in both maize hybrids. Evaluating the morphological characteristics of roots, the drought-tolerant hybrid showed higher means for all parameters evaluated when subjected to drought, and MCA was responsible for longer root length and greater mean root diameter. The results support the potential use of chitosan and its derivatives to increase tolerance to water deficit in maize. 2022-07-13T16:19:22Z 2022-07-13T16:19:22Z 2022-07-13 2022 Artigo de periódico Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 16, n. 2, p. 208-215, 2022. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1144687 Portugues pt_BR openAccess
institution EMBRAPA
collection DSpace
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-alice
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Sistema de bibliotecas de EMBRAPA
language Portugues
pt_BR
topic Quitosana
Milho
Seca
Quitosana
Milho
Seca
spellingShingle Quitosana
Milho
Seca
Quitosana
Milho
Seca
REIS, C. O. dos
MAGALHAES, P. C.
AMBROSIO, A. dos S.
ALMEIDA, L. G.
CARVALHO, D. T.
SOUZA, T. C, de
Do chitosan and its derivatives have the same protective effect on drought-contrasting maize genotypes? An analysis of physiological and production processes.
description Water stress is among the most severe abiotic stress factors for maize production. The application of chitosan causes various responses in plants, as a function of its structure and concentration. Therefore, chemical modifications were proposed in this study to enhance the biological effects on plants. Hybrid maize plants with drought-contrasting characteristics, were subjected to water deficit and spraying with chitosan (CHI) and semi-synthesized chitosan derivatives, N‑Succinyl (SUC) and N,O‑Dicarboxymethyl (MCA). The obtained data show that the application of CHI and its derivatives (0.5 mg.plant-1 ) led to an increase in production for the two evaluated hybrids in comparison with the control under stress. Regarding leaf gas exchange, over the stress period, it was observed that the application of the MCA derivative yielded greater Pn than the other treatments in plants subjected to drought, in both hybrids. In the evaluation of chlorophyll content, there was an increase in this content through the application of CHI and its derivatives for both maize hybrids under study. With water recovery in plants, the water potential (Ψmd) of those treated with chitosan derivatives was greater than that of the irrigated control plants. In the quantification of proline concentration, higher values were observed in plants treated with MCA derivatives for the drought-sensitive hybrid. Chitosan derivatives, SUC and MCA, were responsible for higher starch concentrations in both maize hybrids. Evaluating the morphological characteristics of roots, the drought-tolerant hybrid showed higher means for all parameters evaluated when subjected to drought, and MCA was responsible for longer root length and greater mean root diameter. The results support the potential use of chitosan and its derivatives to increase tolerance to water deficit in maize.
author2 CAROLINE OLIVEIRA DOS REIS, Universidade Federal de Lavras; PAULO CESAR MAGALHAES, CNPMS; ALEXANDRA DOS SANTOS AMBRÓSIO, Universidade Federal de Alfenas; LORENA GABRIELA ALMEIDA, Universidade Federal de Lavras; DIOGO TEIXEIRA CARVALHO, Universidade Federal de Alfenas; THIAGO CORREA DE SOUZA, Universidade Federal de Alfenas.
author_facet CAROLINE OLIVEIRA DOS REIS, Universidade Federal de Lavras; PAULO CESAR MAGALHAES, CNPMS; ALEXANDRA DOS SANTOS AMBRÓSIO, Universidade Federal de Alfenas; LORENA GABRIELA ALMEIDA, Universidade Federal de Lavras; DIOGO TEIXEIRA CARVALHO, Universidade Federal de Alfenas; THIAGO CORREA DE SOUZA, Universidade Federal de Alfenas.
REIS, C. O. dos
MAGALHAES, P. C.
AMBROSIO, A. dos S.
ALMEIDA, L. G.
CARVALHO, D. T.
SOUZA, T. C, de
format Artigo de periódico
topic_facet Quitosana
Milho
Seca
author REIS, C. O. dos
MAGALHAES, P. C.
AMBROSIO, A. dos S.
ALMEIDA, L. G.
CARVALHO, D. T.
SOUZA, T. C, de
author_sort REIS, C. O. dos
title Do chitosan and its derivatives have the same protective effect on drought-contrasting maize genotypes? An analysis of physiological and production processes.
title_short Do chitosan and its derivatives have the same protective effect on drought-contrasting maize genotypes? An analysis of physiological and production processes.
title_full Do chitosan and its derivatives have the same protective effect on drought-contrasting maize genotypes? An analysis of physiological and production processes.
title_fullStr Do chitosan and its derivatives have the same protective effect on drought-contrasting maize genotypes? An analysis of physiological and production processes.
title_full_unstemmed Do chitosan and its derivatives have the same protective effect on drought-contrasting maize genotypes? An analysis of physiological and production processes.
title_sort do chitosan and its derivatives have the same protective effect on drought-contrasting maize genotypes? an analysis of physiological and production processes.
publishDate 2022-07-13
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1144687
work_keys_str_mv AT reiscodos dochitosananditsderivativeshavethesameprotectiveeffectondroughtcontrastingmaizegenotypesananalysisofphysiologicalandproductionprocesses
AT magalhaespc dochitosananditsderivativeshavethesameprotectiveeffectondroughtcontrastingmaizegenotypesananalysisofphysiologicalandproductionprocesses
AT ambrosioadoss dochitosananditsderivativeshavethesameprotectiveeffectondroughtcontrastingmaizegenotypesananalysisofphysiologicalandproductionprocesses
AT almeidalg dochitosananditsderivativeshavethesameprotectiveeffectondroughtcontrastingmaizegenotypesananalysisofphysiologicalandproductionprocesses
AT carvalhodt dochitosananditsderivativeshavethesameprotectiveeffectondroughtcontrastingmaizegenotypesananalysisofphysiologicalandproductionprocesses
AT souzatcde dochitosananditsderivativeshavethesameprotectiveeffectondroughtcontrastingmaizegenotypesananalysisofphysiologicalandproductionprocesses
_version_ 1756028421249433600